
Executive summary
Seedance 2.5 is the model to beat for ads with a real-looking person, and it holds up to 30 seconds in one take. Kling 4.0 is the newest serious contender. Veo 3.1 has the most cinematic light. For cheap hook drafts with sound, MiniMax H3 and Veo 3.1 Lite cost a few cents a second.
Benchmarked pricing & duration
Model | Provider | Cost / sec | Longest take |
|---|---|---|---|
Seedance 2.5 | ByteDance | about $0.23 | 30 seconds |
Kling 4.0 | Kuaishou | about $0.16 | 30 seconds |
Veo 3.1 | $0.40 | 8 seconds | |
Wan 3.0 | Alibaba | about $0.10 | 30 seconds |
MiniMax H3 | MiniMax | about $0.06 | 15 seconds |
Veo 3.1 Lite | $0.05 | 8 seconds |
Prices are what the model makers charge, read in October 2026 and rounded. Most cost more at 1080p.
Model recommendation matrix
A real-looking person talking about your product: Seedance 2.5
Best for realistic human delivery
A 30-second spot for less: Wan 3.0 or Kling 4.0
Best for affordable full-length takes
A cinematic, glossy look: Veo 3.1
Best for high-end lighting & gloss
Lots of cheap hook tests: MiniMax H3 or Veo 3.1 Lite
Best for high-volume rapid iteration

Technical inflection points
Video models got native sound: speech and room sound render in the same pass as the picture.
Thirty seconds in one take became normal at the top.
A few cents a second is enough to test a hook: draft cheap, finish the winner on a premium model.
Labels still need help: start from a real product photo, then animate it.
Data & Methodology
Open dataset: 40 video models, published under CC-BY by Hermoso AI.
Hermoso AI · October 2026
Documentation and reference links
Hermoso runs every one of these models at the model maker's price: https://hermoso.ai
AI video ad cost by model, October 2026
What a second of AI video costs from the model makers, and which model to use for which ad. By Hermoso AI.
REPORT · OCTOBER 2026